Good at social media but not ‘experts’

We’ve often been called a social media ‘experts’. What does that mean and how shallow a concept is it?

The word ‘expert’ signifies a total understanding, a successful track record and someone who has made all the mistakes along the way. That is something that is not really possible in a media landscape that is rapidly shifting.  We explore and use social media from the perspective of digital public relations but we would not claim ‘expert’ status.

Social media expert or guru status can only be awarded to a tiny group of individuals, people like Digg and Facebook founders Kevin Rose and Mark Zuckerburg.  They’re about as close as you can get to a social media ‘expert’.  Anyone else claiming expert status is in danger of making themselves appear ridiculous.

Any decent Digital PR practitioner worth their salt understands social media along with other practical applications like buzz monitoring, blogs, SEO, email marketing, semantic mark-up: even basic HTML. The best marketers and PR practitioners are fluent in all media and able to develop ideas and content that engage and are re-used.

Great Digital PR itself is not about the platforms it uses, but about the ideas.  Any platform or technology are merely enablers and, while an understanding of the platform is important, good practitioners will already have mastered social media.

Mastery of social media is not that unique or valuable. It might seem so at the moment because of a current shortfall in digital literacy: it will not last that long.  I know this seems obvious but I think it needs to be restated:  what is valuable is the ability to produce strong PR and marketing for tangible results.  It’s that simple. And those results are increasingly measurable with buzz monitoring tools.

It can be argued that digital literacy will become more universal and the digital divide will disappear. It can even be proposed [http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/09/21/just-how-large-is-the-business-worlds-digital-divide/] that an educated person’s ‘literacy’ – in an educated sense – will come to include programming and an overall capability in digital media. We call people who are proficient in mobiles, PCs and game consoles geeks. In reality, they are just more ‘literate’ than other parts of the population.

Marketing managers and PR professionals should be fluent in creating successful ideas and working with media and tools on all platforms.  That is the basic requirement of success in Digital PR. This fluency will include what is possible in Web application development, from strong writing, blogging,  branding campaigns, working in modern CMS and email marketing platforms, SEO, semantic mark-up, manipulating digital images, through to podcast technology, relationship-building and everything in between.

Demonstrating proficiency with the tools themselves is a necessary but relatively widespread skill.  That’s not where the talent exists: everyone should have a basic knowledge of working with the tools in the digital toolbox.

Creative agencies that are slow to adopt skillsets and immerse themselves in new techniques have always been susceptible to sudden exits. Remember the first Apple Mac and how typographers and reprographic professionals initially decried its capabilities? Marketing and public relations agencies need to be digitally literate.

The bottom line is this:  thinking in terms of tools or platforms is the wrong viewpoint (even within Web-based tools) as their use is only limited by your creativity. An educated person in Digital PR should not claim to be ‘expert’ in all the fields and skillsets required but they should have mastered what is palpably becoming a vital part of today’s marketing communications platforms.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Twitter

10 Comments

  1. Great comments. I always look at people calling them ‘experts’ as just waiting for a big fall from their pedestals. I have seen it happen where an Expert says something and a member of the audience asks a question or states a FACT that oppose their viewpoint or actually adds to the groups understanding.

    We are all good at social media - or at least those of us using Web 2.0 principles, using blogs, forums, facebook, twitter, youtube, other social network sites to our advantage.

    People have been asking me to share my knowledge on the subject and I don’t even think I do anything, special, different or worth sharing. Clearly though, knowing more than someone else puts you at an advantage and expert status relatively speaking.

    Some people are just slightly better than others at the moment. Watch out for them geeks coming out of schools and colleges because those so called experts at the moment won’t know what hit them.

    Bobby :-)

    http://www.bobbygill.co.uk

    Posted March 19, 2009 at 12:32 pm | Permalink
  2. Hi Jeremy,

    Interesting article and couldn’t agree more with more than a few points you made, but we (socmed types) must also accept that businessmen wish to deal with those they feel secure working with e.g. an ‘expert’ if you will. This is why I feel the adjective gets so much air time on business cards, etc.

    Also Bobby makes a great point that relative knowledge is an important factor when being referred to as an expert.

    Personally I think we spend way too much time on this topic and have made a mountain out of a mole hill. Many of my peers have agreed (privately) with me on this from Twitter and in emails. It seems to me to be only discussed by those within our industry, it is not in fact an issue for the vast vast majority of clients. Never once has anyone (client or otherwise) ever questioned my credentials, most know me before they meet me and often I get introduced as the ‘expert’.

    Finally, I seriously question what you were thinking when you referred to those two individuals as ’social media’ experts. In fact I found it amusing. Isn’t that like saying that the videographer is an expert broadcaster?

    Sure these guys built tools that are great for social media professionals but they are hardly experts of social media. Social media is not a ’social platform’ it is a media. What expertise or mastery have they shown outside of being associated with their ideas?

    Long before I would have named them I would have picked someone like Jason Calacanis who’s ability to generate massive marketing results from his use of social media or Mark Cuban who has done a great job getting access to innovative startups through social media, promoted his teams, etc.

    These guys probably even aren’t great examples but they were the first that came to my mind and these guys I believe ‘get’ social media far more than icons you mentioned.

    What hammers home my point home best is just acknowledging how FB is making news for screwing up far more than they are making the news for their successes. 2009 is all about FB botch jobs not innovation.

    Cheers
    Roger

    Posted March 23, 2009 at 10:11 pm | Permalink
  3. Hello fellow members, I wanted to introduce myself. Im Kenneth.
    I guess I should start participating instead of just reading the posts all the time.
    I thought about starting my own board but Im glad I found this one instead. Great Info!
    See ya....

    Posted March 24, 2009 at 4:34 am | Permalink
  4. Thanks, Roger, for widening the discussion and mentioning the molehill. Your choice of ‘experts’ is also exemplary.

    Posted March 24, 2009 at 10:37 am | Permalink
  5. This is a great topic, but who is to say they are an ‘expert’ in any software, service or media?

    What qualifies a person to the title of ‘Expert’?

    Spending lots of time using it, or spending lots of time developing the media? I think there are plenty of ‘Experts in Use and Abuse’ and very few who actually understand the complete workings behind the scenes.

    Posted March 25, 2009 at 6:14 pm | Permalink
  6. Mark, I think you’re right and I was trying to explore the issue of self-proclaimed experts.

    Join us at http://digitalpublicrelations.ning.com?

    Posted March 26, 2009 at 1:43 pm | Permalink
  7. Expert : a dictionary definition - a person who has extensive skill or knowledge in a particular field.

    If you call yorself an expert then you’re putting yourself up to be shot at, no? So why do it? We’re not all rampant egotists in the agency business, are we?!

    I always say ‘I can tell you I’m funny, or I can make oyu laugh’.

    If I make a difference to your business by my recommendations, and we all make money and hit our KPIs, then call me what you want - expert, guru, opinion leader, saviour, mentor, or just plain Tim, I don’t care!

    Posted March 26, 2009 at 5:04 pm | Permalink
  8. Plain Tim, I’ll stick to, then.

    Posted March 26, 2009 at 5:27 pm | Permalink
  9. Great site this blog.juicedigital.co.uk and I am really pleased to see you have what I am actually looking for here and this this post is exactly what I am interested in. I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor :)

    Posted April 4, 2009 at 2:28 am | Permalink
  10. I’ll put you on our email list, “coniIonible”, if that’s OK?

    Posted April 7, 2009 at 9:38 am | Permalink

One Trackback

  1. [...] Good at social media but not ‘experts’ | Juice Digital. [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*